Thrill

A feature of reckless endangerment in your time and space can be extracted from or out of the level of continuum in the aforementioned session: in that you would subtract one feature over the other, in your timeframe. And so, this is how we approach the information: in a cause, for a cause, you would not seek to find another form than this: to take of, to partake of, in another or before. It is of one nature, then the next, as you will see, that the term reckless endangerment forms what it must, what it will, in your time and afterward.

For it would not be such that you could actually predetermine fate, at your will, if this were not so. You see, by your very nature as Sons of God, you will and purport things into existence, more than you are entirely aware. And so, with the reckless endangerment, you are driving the substructures of time and space by the intentions of ego and then partaking of them one by one. Minus the whole, in your particle-oriented format, then, you have examined the substructures and made of them what you will.

In reckless endangerment, you will that the documentation of your acts find its way out in one fashion or the other, but you do not will that it would find its way out to you. What I am saying is you will the thrill without the consequences. And that therein lies in the heart of all reckless endangerment, for the thrill’s sake, the naming of the inception of thrill over the inception of love, or the extenuation of the joy that outlasts the explosion of the thrill.

Thrill, you see, can be bound up in the ego alone. And when it is so, it is of such extension that you would not recognize joy, or love, or peace, or any of the qualities that remain in essence for the betterment of all. Thrill is a separatist by nature, it is of one accord only in that it finds itself again, and does not seek to share. It falls at the expense of others, to the expense of others, and attempts by its very autonomous-seeking nature to draw within itself of itself.